29 June
2012
The “Right” to Health Care: A Question of American Values
By Contributor Access for All, Rolling Back Government Intervention No Comments
America was founded on the right to BE something-free- not to HAVE anything, such as property, money, or life, and certainly not the right to demand service from another individual, i.e. healthcare. Due to the lack of personal responsibility, with constantly rising costs, and an increasingly unhealthy workforce, the right to health care impairs a [...]
29 June
2012
Certificate of Need: Access Denied
By Contributor Access for All No Comments
The argument for Certificate of Need is that improved government planning can both limit costs caused by duplicative services and encourage the development of healthcare facilities in areas with limited access; areas that are typically rural and with poorer populations. However, CON laws have not lived up to their claims—most definitely not in North Carolina. [...]
29 June
2012
The Impact of the American Affordable Health Choices Act on the state of Montana
By Contributor Access for All, Rolling Back Government Intervention No Comments
The Heritage Foundation commissioned The Lewin Group, a highly respected health care policy and management consulting firm, to examine the impact of the American Affordable Health Choices Act of 2009 (H.R. 3200). In its analysis of Montana, Lewin presents data estimating the impact ofthe bill, assuming eligibility to the exchange is open to all employers [...]
29 June
2012
What to Do on the Day after Obamacare
By Contributor Access for All, Rolling Back Government Intervention No Comments
If Obamacare gets struck down, the United States still faces the millions of uninsured. There are ways to provide a vibrant market for health insurance, if the country moves in the right direction. Written by John Cochrane.
29 June
2012
Health Savings Accounts: Consumer-Driven Health Care for North Carolina Public Employees and Teachers
By Contributor Access for All No Comments
HSAs are a form of medical savings account, similar to the now-familiar IRAs. These accounts are the property of the employee and can accumulate interest and dividends like other savings vehicles. Funds that are not used for health care-related expenses can be used for retirement living and can also be willed to one’s heirs. When [...]
29 June
2012
Health Care Reform: Do Other Countries Have the Answers?
By Contributor Rolling Back Government Intervention No Comments
The health care systems of all developed countries face three unrelenting problems: rising costs, inadequate quality, and incomplete access to care. Much analysis published in medical journals suggests that other countries have found superior solutions to these problems.1 This conclusion is at odds with economic research that is published in journals physicians seldom read, using [...]
29 June
2012
Hidden Obamacare provision routed money to insider unions, governments, businesses
By Contributor Rolling Back Government Intervention No Comments
A little-known provision in PPACA created the Early Retiree Reinsurance Program (ERRP) to subsidize employer-sponsored health benefit programs for early retirees. Nationally, about three-fifths of such plans serve local-government employees or are union-run or union-negotiated. Essentially, taxpayers will be billed another $5 billion to cover public employees in addition to the billions already required for [...]
29 June
2012
Change We Can’t Afford
By Contributor Rolling Back Government Intervention No Comments
After ferocious public debate and two years of implementation, the legislation still faces an uncertain fate – and the Obama administration still finds itself working to convince a majority of Americans that its signature health care reform isn’t a bad thing. While the U.S. Supreme Court will also focus on the key issue of whether [...]
29 June
2012
Building a Market-Based Health-Insurance Exchange in New York
By Contributor Access for All, Rolling Back Government Intervention No Comments
The idea of the exchanges has, like the ACA more generally, prompted disparate views about their value and expected range of offerings. Proponents believe that the exchanges have the potential to inject much-needed consumer choice and competition into the markets for individual and small-group health insurance, improving the coverage, the cost, and even the care. [...]
29 June
2012
Colorado Amendment 63 and its Shifty Opposition
By Contributor Rolling Back Government Intervention No Comments
Mandatory insurance takes what’s wrong with health insurance and makes it worse. It means higher costs, less incentive to please patients, and the prohibition of affordable insurance plans. Amendment 63 would block Colorado politicians from imposing mandatory insurance. It would also prevent the feds from pressuring the Colorado legislature to enforce Washington’s version of it. [...]

